One Mr DJ Jaffe, the self-styled Executive Director of
Mental Illness Policy Org, “a non-partisan think-tank on serious mental illness
funded by people with and families of the seriously mentally ill only,” had a
startling opinion piece published online in Psychiatric Times on February 14, 2018.
Permit me to quote his final two paragraphs to show you his
bias, ahem, there is no other word for his opinion.
The new Assistant Secretary
[overseeing the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration of
the US, known as SAMSHA] has spoken about requiring peer support
specialists to work in concert with medical experts. She has also taken steps
to eliminate non-evidence-based programs from SAMSHA and to focus it on
evidence-based programs that help the seriously mentally ill. But the
leadership of CMHS…is still putting out contracts that are burdened with the
expensive requirement to hire peers without sufficient evidence they improve
outcomes or do so better than non-peers.
Using scarce resources to support
programs like paid peer support that lack evidence they help—while so many
proven programs go unfunded—makes little sense.* Research should be conducted
to determine if paid peer support improves meaningful metrics in people with
serious mental illness and if provision of those services by paid peers is
superior to provision of the same services by others. Paid peer support should
not be expanded until that research is clear. If expanded, then steps should be
taken to ensure that the peer support trade associations do not lobby to make
treatment for the seriously mentally ill more difficult.
*Examples of programs proven to
improve meaningful metrics in people with serious mental illness include
appointments with psychiatrists, hospitalization, medications, electroconvulsive
therapy, assisted outpatient treatment, clubhouses, assertive case management,
intensive case management, supported housing, psycho-social rehabilitation, and
others.
(I’ve even quoted his footnote to his conclusion to show that
he has not heard of many contemporary treatments like transcranial magnetic stimulation
(tCMS), and that his ideas about what works do not include meditation/prayer as
second in line—but rather, hospitalization!)
And notice how he is authoritarian
enough to want “steps… [so] that the peer support trade associations do not
lobby.”
Why is he wrong? I can be briefer than he….
- Peer employees of mental health agencies provide consumers/patients with self-esteem. They see that various forms of employment are possible for them.
- Those who are peer employees themselves have jobs that bring them self-respect as well as income.
- “Patient-centered treatment” is required by the US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Serrvices (known as CMS) under the rubric, “Partnerships for Patients.”
(C) Copyright Deborahmichelle Sanders 2018. All rights reserved.
No comments:
Post a Comment